Governing Security After War: Lessons From the Post-9/11 Era

Governing Security After War: The Politics of Institutional Change in the Security Sector

by Louis-Alexandre Berg

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	4943 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	316 pages
Lending	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
X-Ray for textbooks	:	Enabled

FREE

The post-9/11 era has been marked by a dramatic increase in the use of military force in the name of counterterrorism. The United States has invaded Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, and has conducted drone strikes in Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia. These interventions have been costly in terms of both human life and financial resources, and have often failed to achieve their objectives.

The traditional approaches of military intervention and state-building have proven to be ineffective in governing security after war. Military interventions often lead to more violence and instability, and state-building projects are often unsustainable in the long term. This is because these approaches fail to address the root causes of conflict, such as poverty, inequality, and political oppression.

More creative and holistic approaches are needed to govern security after war. These approaches must focus on addressing the underlying causes of conflict, building sustainable institutions, and empowering local communities.

One promising approach is the concept of "security governance." Security governance is a multi-disciplinary approach that seeks to understand and improve the way that security is governed. It involves a range of actors, including governments, civil society organizations, and international organizations. Security governance approaches seek to address the root causes of conflict, build sustainable institutions, and empower local communities.

Another promising approach is the concept of "human security." Human security is a broad concept that encompasses a range of issues, including economic security, food security, health security, and environmental security. Human security approaches seek to address the needs of individuals and communities, and to create a more just and equitable world.

The post-9/11 era has been a difficult one for global security. However, it has also provided an opportunity to rethink the way that we govern security. By learning from the lessons of the past, we can develop more effective and sustainable approaches to governing security after war.

Lessons From the Post-9/11 Era

The post-9/11 era has taught us a number of important lessons about governing security after war. These lessons include:

• Military interventions are often ineffective and counterproductive.
• State-building projects are often unsustainable in the long term.
• The root causes of conflict must be addressed in order to achieve lasting peace and security.
• Security governance and human security approaches offer promising alternatives to traditional approaches.

These lessons should be taken into account when developing future approaches to governing security after war.

The post-9/11 era has been a challenging time for global security. However, it has also provided an opportunity to rethink the way that we govern security after war. By learning from the lessons of the past, we can develop more effective and sustainable approaches to governing security after war. These approaches must focus on addressing the root causes of conflict, building sustainable institutions, and empowering local communities.

Governing Security After War: The Politics of Institutional Change in the Security Sector

by Louis-Alexandre Berg

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	4943 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	316 pages
Lending	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
X-Ray for textbooks	:	Enabled

FREE